<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 538 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396869</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed a de novo assessment by the Assessing Officer for the assessee&#039;s claim of exemption under Section 54 of the Income Tax Act, deduction of Rs. 21 lakh retained by the buyer due to a house tax dispute, and cost of construction of the flat claimed against short-term capital gain. The Tribunal emphasized reevaluation of the documentary evidence and consideration of relevant CBDT circulars and judicial precedents. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, with the order pronounced on 21st July 2020.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2020 13:21:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=618188" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 538 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396869</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed a de novo assessment by the Assessing Officer for the assessee&#039;s claim of exemption under Section 54 of the Income Tax Act, deduction of Rs. 21 lakh retained by the buyer due to a house tax dispute, and cost of construction of the flat claimed against short-term capital gain. The Tribunal emphasized reevaluation of the documentary evidence and consideration of relevant CBDT circulars and judicial precedents. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, with the order pronounced on 21st July 2020.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396869</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>