<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules No Jurisdiction to Alter Resolution Plan Post-Approval; Changes Beyond Clerical Errors Not Permitted.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54135</link>
    <description>Rectification in the approved Resolution Plan - Adjudicating Authority had no jurisdiction to entertain an application for rectification of Resolution Plan and making substantial changes in the Plan, after a lapse of 13 months of the completion of CIRP, even after the approval and implementation of the Resolution Plan on the pretext of rectification of clerical or typographical error in the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2020 12:34:16 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2020 12:34:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=618181" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules No Jurisdiction to Alter Resolution Plan Post-Approval; Changes Beyond Clerical Errors Not Permitted.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54135</link>
      <description>Rectification in the approved Resolution Plan - Adjudicating Authority had no jurisdiction to entertain an application for rectification of Resolution Plan and making substantial changes in the Plan, after a lapse of 13 months of the completion of CIRP, even after the approval and implementation of the Resolution Plan on the pretext of rectification of clerical or typographical error in the order.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2020 12:34:16 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54135</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>