<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1941 (7) TMI 23 - PRIVEY COUNCIL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289256</link>
    <description>Restitution of possession under the court&#039;s inherent powers is available only where it is necessary to undo an injury caused by the court&#039;s act and to serve the ends of justice; it will not be granted where the applicants have no lawful right to remain in possession and would still be trespassers. An unregistered agreement cannot create an enforceable right to possession against third parties, and section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act protects only an estoppel between the parties without conferring a transferable interest. On that basis, the appellants could not disturb the respondents&#039; possession under the existing lease.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 1941 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2020 14:37:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=618137" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1941 (7) TMI 23 - PRIVEY COUNCIL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289256</link>
      <description>Restitution of possession under the court&#039;s inherent powers is available only where it is necessary to undo an injury caused by the court&#039;s act and to serve the ends of justice; it will not be granted where the applicants have no lawful right to remain in possession and would still be trespassers. An unregistered agreement cannot create an enforceable right to possession against third parties, and section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act protects only an estoppel between the parties without conferring a transferable interest. On that basis, the appellants could not disturb the respondents&#039; possession under the existing lease.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 1941 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289256</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>