<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 696 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289253</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court addressed the practice of granting interest at a fixed rate of 18% per annum in all cases, emphasizing that interest rates should be determined based on the specific circumstances of each case. The Court clarified that compensation for mental agony/harassment should only be awarded in cases of deficiency in service or misfeasance in public office resulting in actual loss or injury. In a specific case involving delayed possession of an allotted plot, the Court directed a recalculation of interest payments, specifying the methodology and repayment process to rectify discrepancies and ensure fairness in resolving the dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2020 13:54:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=618134" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 696 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289253</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court addressed the practice of granting interest at a fixed rate of 18% per annum in all cases, emphasizing that interest rates should be determined based on the specific circumstances of each case. The Court clarified that compensation for mental agony/harassment should only be awarded in cases of deficiency in service or misfeasance in public office resulting in actual loss or injury. In a specific case involving delayed possession of an allotted plot, the Court directed a recalculation of interest payments, specifying the methodology and repayment process to rectify discrepancies and ensure fairness in resolving the dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289253</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>