<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 523 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396854</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee on certain grounds related to the treatment of securities as stock-in-trade instead of investments, and the computation of diminution value on securities. However, the disallowance under section 36(1)(viia) of the Act was upheld, emphasizing the necessity of provisions being made in the books of account for deductions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2020 19:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=618115" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 523 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396854</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee on certain grounds related to the treatment of securities as stock-in-trade instead of investments, and the computation of diminution value on securities. However, the disallowance under section 36(1)(viia) of the Act was upheld, emphasizing the necessity of provisions being made in the books of account for deductions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396854</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>