https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396847 The NCLAT held that the appellant, as the sole beneficiary under the deceased's Will, had the competency to file the appeal for winding up the company. Additionally, the NCLT was empowered to proceed with the winding-up petition despite the company's name being struck off under Section 248 of the Companies Act, 2013. The impugned order dismissing the petition was set aside, and the matter was remitted to the NCLT for a fresh decision based on merit and legal considerations. No costs were awarded, and the parties were directed to appear before the NCLT for further proceedings. en-us Wed, 18 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Jul 2020 11:07:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396847 The NCLAT held that the appellant, as the sole beneficiary under the deceased's Will, had the competency to file the appeal for winding up the company. Additionally, the NCLT was empowered to proceed with the winding-up petition despite the company's name being struck off under Section 248 of the Companies Act, 2013. The impugned order dismissing the petition was set aside, and the matter was remitted to the NCLT for a fresh decision based on merit and legal considerations. No costs were awarded, and the parties were directed to appear before the NCLT for further proceedings. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 18 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396847