<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 1285 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289242</link>
    <description>When a plaint is returned for presentation before the court of competent jurisdiction on the ground of lack of jurisdiction, that disposal is not an adjudication on the merits of the suit. In such circumstances, the litigant is entitled to refund of the entire court fee so the plaint may be re-presented before the proper forum with the appropriate fee. The order refusing refund was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2020 08:49:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=618073" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 1285 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289242</link>
      <description>When a plaint is returned for presentation before the court of competent jurisdiction on the ground of lack of jurisdiction, that disposal is not an adjudication on the merits of the suit. In such circumstances, the litigant is entitled to refund of the entire court fee so the plaint may be re-presented before the proper forum with the appropriate fee. The order refusing refund was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289242</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>