<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (2) TMI 145 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289230</link>
    <description>Statutory pre-emption under the West Bengal Non-Agricultural Tenancy Act, 1949 is sustained where the constitutional validity of the relevant provision has already been settled by binding Supreme Court precedent. The stated requirement may fall within the residuary expression &quot;other purposes&quot; in Section 4 where it is analogous to specified purposes or within the provision&#039;s broader meaning. A factual objection concerning the pre-emptor&#039;s means need not be entertained when it was not raised before lower courts and the available material does not establish insufficiency. Limitation is governed by the applicable Special Bench view. Compensation for improvements is unavailable where the purchaser acquired subject to pre-emption and the statute provides no compensation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2020 19:07:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=618067" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (2) TMI 145 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289230</link>
      <description>Statutory pre-emption under the West Bengal Non-Agricultural Tenancy Act, 1949 is sustained where the constitutional validity of the relevant provision has already been settled by binding Supreme Court precedent. The stated requirement may fall within the residuary expression &quot;other purposes&quot; in Section 4 where it is analogous to specified purposes or within the provision&#039;s broader meaning. A factual objection concerning the pre-emptor&#039;s means need not be entertained when it was not raised before lower courts and the available material does not establish insufficiency. Limitation is governed by the applicable Special Bench view. Compensation for improvements is unavailable where the purchaser acquired subject to pre-emption and the statute provides no compensation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289230</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>