<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1958 (3) TMI 97 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289223</link>
    <description>Prize money received by architects for submitting building plans was treated as income arising directly from their professional activity. Because preparing and presenting plans formed part of their ordinary architectural work and the receipt was obtained through professional skill, the exemption for casual and non-recurring income did not apply. The receipt was therefore taxable and not exempt under section 4(3)(vii) of the Income-tax Act, 1922.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2020 12:15:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=617938" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1958 (3) TMI 97 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289223</link>
      <description>Prize money received by architects for submitting building plans was treated as income arising directly from their professional activity. Because preparing and presenting plans formed part of their ordinary architectural work and the receipt was obtained through professional skill, the exemption for casual and non-recurring income did not apply. The receipt was therefore taxable and not exempt under section 4(3)(vii) of the Income-tax Act, 1922.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289223</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>