<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 511 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396842</link>
    <description>The authority concluded that the paver blocks are immovable property, and the applicant is not entitled to avail Input Tax Credit (ITC) under Section 17(5)(d) of the CGST Act. The final order denied the applicant&#039;s claim for ITC.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 12:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=617929" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 511 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396842</link>
      <description>The authority concluded that the paver blocks are immovable property, and the applicant is not entitled to avail Input Tax Credit (ITC) under Section 17(5)(d) of the CGST Act. The final order denied the applicant&#039;s claim for ITC.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396842</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>