<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 509 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396840</link>
    <description>The High Court directed the respondents to decide on the petitioner&#039;s representation within fifteen days, emphasizing the importance of addressing the claim for transitional credit in a timely and lawful manner. The Court required a speaking order to be passed after providing an opportunity for the petitioner or their representative to be heard through video conferencing, without expressing an opinion on the merits of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 17:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=617926" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 509 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396840</link>
      <description>The High Court directed the respondents to decide on the petitioner&#039;s representation within fifteen days, emphasizing the importance of addressing the claim for transitional credit in a timely and lawful manner. The Court required a speaking order to be passed after providing an opportunity for the petitioner or their representative to be heard through video conferencing, without expressing an opinion on the merits of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396840</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>