<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 507 - NATIONAL ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396838</link>
    <description>The Authority found that the Respondent had profiteered by not passing on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) to flat buyers, contravening Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017. The Respondent was ordered to reduce flat prices to reflect the ITC benefit and pass it on to buyers with interest. A penalty under Section 171(3A) of the CGST Act, 2017 was also imposed. The Commissioners of CGST/SGST Tamil Nadu were tasked with overseeing compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 17:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=617922" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 507 - NATIONAL ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396838</link>
      <description>The Authority found that the Respondent had profiteered by not passing on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) to flat buyers, contravening Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017. The Respondent was ordered to reduce flat prices to reflect the ITC benefit and pass it on to buyers with interest. A penalty under Section 171(3A) of the CGST Act, 2017 was also imposed. The Commissioners of CGST/SGST Tamil Nadu were tasked with overseeing compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396838</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>