<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 498 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396829</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, deleting the addition of notional rental income on a commercial property under section 23(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act. The decision was based on the cancellation of the lease, making it impossible for the appellant to rent out the property. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of legal precedents and factual circumstances in determining tax implications related to notional rental income on properties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2020 10:43:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=617910" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 498 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396829</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, deleting the addition of notional rental income on a commercial property under section 23(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act. The decision was based on the cancellation of the lease, making it impossible for the appellant to rent out the property. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of legal precedents and factual circumstances in determining tax implications related to notional rental income on properties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396829</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>