<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 497 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396828</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed both appeals by the Revenue, affirming the decisions of the Commissioner (Appeals) on all disputed issues. The re-opening of assessment under section 147 was declared invalid due to lack of new material. The assessee was entitled to deductions under section 80P(2), and the disallowance under section 14A was deleted. The Tribunal&#039;s order, pronounced on 30th June 2020, considered the COVID-19 pandemic&#039;s impact on procedural timelines.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 14:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=617908" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 497 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396828</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed both appeals by the Revenue, affirming the decisions of the Commissioner (Appeals) on all disputed issues. The re-opening of assessment under section 147 was declared invalid due to lack of new material. The assessee was entitled to deductions under section 80P(2), and the disallowance under section 14A was deleted. The Tribunal&#039;s order, pronounced on 30th June 2020, considered the COVID-19 pandemic&#039;s impact on procedural timelines.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396828</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>