https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396817 The Tribunal clarified that the total Cenvat credit considered for reversal of ineligible credit under Rule 6(3A)(c)(iii) should only include common input services and not those used exclusively for dutiable goods. The appellant's method of calculating the reversal was upheld, overturning the Department's objection. The appeal was allowed, and the adjudication order for recovery and penalty was set aside in favor of the appellant based on established legal principles and previous Tribunal decisions. en-us Fri, 17 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Jul 2020 10:01:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396817 The Tribunal clarified that the total Cenvat credit considered for reversal of ineligible credit under Rule 6(3A)(c)(iii) should only include common input services and not those used exclusively for dutiable goods. The appellant's method of calculating the reversal was upheld, overturning the Department's objection. The appeal was allowed, and the adjudication order for recovery and penalty was set aside in favor of the appellant based on established legal principles and previous Tribunal decisions. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 17 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396817