<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 484 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396815</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to allow deductions on discounts claimed by the appellants, emphasizing the verification of documents and the admissibility of discounts passed on to buyers. The tribunal found no errors in the Commissioner&#039;s order and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, citing a previous decision in the appellant&#039;s favor and the appropriate quantification of discounts using an equalization formula.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2020 15:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=617881" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 484 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396815</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to allow deductions on discounts claimed by the appellants, emphasizing the verification of documents and the admissibility of discounts passed on to buyers. The tribunal found no errors in the Commissioner&#039;s order and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, citing a previous decision in the appellant&#039;s favor and the appropriate quantification of discounts using an equalization formula.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396815</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>