https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396814 The petitioner, a company incorporated in Japan, challenged an assessment order passed by respondent No.4, alleging disregard of submitted documents and violation of natural justice principles. Seeking writs under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner requested the court to quash the assessment order and remand the matter for reconsideration. Despite objections on maintainability due to alternative remedies, the court issued notice and instructed no coercive actions on the assessment order until the returnable date. The case emphasizes the importance of considering legal principles and submitted documents in tax assessment matters. en-us Fri, 17 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Jul 2020 08:45:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396814 The petitioner, a company incorporated in Japan, challenged an assessment order passed by respondent No.4, alleging disregard of submitted documents and violation of natural justice principles. Seeking writs under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner requested the court to quash the assessment order and remand the matter for reconsideration. Despite objections on maintainability due to alternative remedies, the court issued notice and instructed no coercive actions on the assessment order until the returnable date. The case emphasizes the importance of considering legal principles and submitted documents in tax assessment matters. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 17 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396814