<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (2) TMI 101 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22788</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the claim of development rebate allowance under section 33 of the Income-tax Act for the assessment years 1964-65 and 1966-67. The Tribunal&#039;s order was not sustained due to an amendment in section 34(3)(a) by the Finance Act, 1990. The questions were answered in the negative and in favor of the assessee. No costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 10:54:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=61787" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (2) TMI 101 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22788</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the claim of development rebate allowance under section 33 of the Income-tax Act for the assessment years 1964-65 and 1966-67. The Tribunal&#039;s order was not sustained due to an amendment in section 34(3)(a) by the Finance Act, 1990. The questions were answered in the negative and in favor of the assessee. No costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22788</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>