https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289210 A dispute in a suit for restitution of conjugal rights was validly referred to arbitration where the court retained its own discretion and the award merely resolved disputed facts; on that footing, the award could be acted upon and the suit was dismissed because the marriage was held invalid. On costs, the District Judge could not vary the trial court's costs order against a defendant who had filed no appeal on that point. The substantive dismissal was maintained, but the costs order was corrected so that each party bore its own costs at trial, while the plaintiff remained liable for the defendant's appellate costs. en-us Fri, 23 Nov 1928 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Jul 2020 17:58:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289210 A dispute in a suit for restitution of conjugal rights was validly referred to arbitration where the court retained its own discretion and the award merely resolved disputed facts; on that footing, the award could be acted upon and the suit was dismissed because the marriage was held invalid. On costs, the District Judge could not vary the trial court's costs order against a defendant who had filed no appeal on that point. The substantive dismissal was maintained, but the costs order was corrected so that each party bore its own costs at trial, while the plaintiff remained liable for the defendant's appellate costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 23 Nov 1928 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289210