https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289209 A matrimonial dispute could validly be referred to arbitration under the wide terms of Section 21 of the Indian Arbitration Act, 1940, as no authority showed that such matters were excluded from arbitration. The Madras HC also found no jurisdictional defect in the trial court's reference order, so revisional interference under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure was not justified. The reference to arbitrators was therefore held competent, and the revision petition was dismissed. en-us Tue, 13 Mar 1945 00:00:00 +0630 Mon, 20 Jul 2020 17:47:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289209 A matrimonial dispute could validly be referred to arbitration under the wide terms of Section 21 of the Indian Arbitration Act, 1940, as no authority showed that such matters were excluded from arbitration. The Madras HC also found no jurisdictional defect in the trial court's reference order, so revisional interference under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure was not justified. The reference to arbitrators was therefore held competent, and the revision petition was dismissed. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 13 Mar 1945 00:00:00 +0630 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289209