<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 472 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396803</link>
    <description>The tribunal held that foreclosure charges collected by banks and non-banking financial companies on premature termination of loans are not subject to service tax under &quot;banking and other financial services.&quot; The charges were deemed as compensation for breach of contract, not consideration for a service provided, thus not falling under taxable services as defined by the Finance Act. The decision favored the respondent, setting aside the demand for service tax and emphasizing that foreclosure charges do not attract service tax liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2022 12:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=617837" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 472 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396803</link>
      <description>The tribunal held that foreclosure charges collected by banks and non-banking financial companies on premature termination of loans are not subject to service tax under &quot;banking and other financial services.&quot; The charges were deemed as compensation for breach of contract, not consideration for a service provided, thus not falling under taxable services as defined by the Finance Act. The decision favored the respondent, setting aside the demand for service tax and emphasizing that foreclosure charges do not attract service tax liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396803</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>