<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 469 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396800</link>
    <description>Return of empty bottles from customers was treated as a separate purchase transaction under the West Bengal Value Added Tax Act, 2003, because the bottles formed part of a composite sale of country spirit and there was no reliable material showing any distinct caution money or security deposit. The statutory provisions on goods sold with containers or packing materials did not assist the assessee on these facts, as the empty bottles were not returned under any express return arrangement. Applying the definition of purchase, the tribunal concluded that transfer of property for consideration occurred when the bottles were returned, so purchase tax was attracted and the revisional order and Bureau report were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2020 14:10:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=617834" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 469 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396800</link>
      <description>Return of empty bottles from customers was treated as a separate purchase transaction under the West Bengal Value Added Tax Act, 2003, because the bottles formed part of a composite sale of country spirit and there was no reliable material showing any distinct caution money or security deposit. The statutory provisions on goods sold with containers or packing materials did not assist the assessee on these facts, as the empty bottles were not returned under any express return arrangement. Applying the definition of purchase, the tribunal concluded that transfer of property for consideration occurred when the bottles were returned, so purchase tax was attracted and the revisional order and Bureau report were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396800</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>