https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289194 The Commission held that the petitioner, an intra-State entity of CSEB, is liable to share transmission losses under the Sharing Regulations. Despite the petitioner's claims of using a dedicated transmission line separate from the inter-State Transmission System, it was found that the line is considered part of the ISTS. The Commission upheld the application of transmission charges and losses to the petitioner's scheduled energy, in line with previous orders. The Commission dismissed the review petition, stating that the issues raised were more appropriate for an appeal than a review, as no errors of fact or law were found on the record. en-us Fri, 01 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 19 Jul 2020 10:57:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289194 The Commission held that the petitioner, an intra-State entity of CSEB, is liable to share transmission losses under the Sharing Regulations. Despite the petitioner's claims of using a dedicated transmission line separate from the inter-State Transmission System, it was found that the line is considered part of the ISTS. The Commission upheld the application of transmission charges and losses to the petitioner's scheduled energy, in line with previous orders. The Commission dismissed the review petition, stating that the issues raised were more appropriate for an appeal than a review, as no errors of fact or law were found on the record. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 01 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289194