https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289197 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order due to the lack of conclusive evidence, shortcomings in the cross-examination process, and contradictions within the order. The detailed analysis of the issues highlighted the legal complexities involved in evaluating evidence and the importance of adhering to procedural fairness in reaching judicial decisions. en-us Thu, 16 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 19 Jul 2020 10:57:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289197 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order due to the lack of conclusive evidence, shortcomings in the cross-examination process, and contradictions within the order. The detailed analysis of the issues highlighted the legal complexities involved in evaluating evidence and the importance of adhering to procedural fairness in reaching judicial decisions. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 16 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289197