<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 438 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396769</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the applicability of Section 206C to the transactions involving the sale of scrap material purchased from railways, rejecting the assessee&#039;s argument. It confirmed the liability for not collecting tax at source under Section 206C(6A) and imposed interest under Section 206C(7). The tribunal directed a reexamination of the classification of goods sold by the assessee, emphasizing adherence to tax collection provisions and accurate classification of goods for determining tax obligations correctly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2020 12:09:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=617730" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 438 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396769</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the applicability of Section 206C to the transactions involving the sale of scrap material purchased from railways, rejecting the assessee&#039;s argument. It confirmed the liability for not collecting tax at source under Section 206C(6A) and imposed interest under Section 206C(7). The tribunal directed a reexamination of the classification of goods sold by the assessee, emphasizing adherence to tax collection provisions and accurate classification of goods for determining tax obligations correctly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396769</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>