<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 437 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396768</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and remanded the issues back for fresh consideration. The CIT(A) was directed to hear the assessee before deciding afresh. The appeal was treated as allowed for statistical purposes, with the judgment pronounced on June 29, 2020.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2020 12:08:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=617729" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 437 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396768</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and remanded the issues back for fresh consideration. The CIT(A) was directed to hear the assessee before deciding afresh. The appeal was treated as allowed for statistical purposes, with the judgment pronounced on June 29, 2020.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396768</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>