https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289180 Correspondence treated as the agreement to lease, and though unregistered it was admissible for the collateral purpose of explaining the tenancy terms. On construction of the lease, the tenants had to deliver possession when the tenancy ended and could remove structures only on determination of the tenancy; that contractual arrangement displaced the ordinary rule under the Transfer of Property Act. The right of removal had to be exercised while possession continued, or at least within a reasonable time after termination. As possession had been surrendered and the structures were not removed in time, no subsisting right, title or interest remained when attachment was levied, and the attachment was raised. en-us Tue, 03 Dec 1940 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Jul 2020 10:56:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289180 Correspondence treated as the agreement to lease, and though unregistered it was admissible for the collateral purpose of explaining the tenancy terms. On construction of the lease, the tenants had to deliver possession when the tenancy ended and could remove structures only on determination of the tenancy; that contractual arrangement displaced the ordinary rule under the Transfer of Property Act. The right of removal had to be exercised while possession continued, or at least within a reasonable time after termination. As possession had been surrendered and the structures were not removed in time, no subsisting right, title or interest remained when attachment was levied, and the attachment was raised. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 03 Dec 1940 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289180