https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289179 A tenancy of land with constructions did not amount to "accommodation" under the U.P. (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947 because the statutory definition was confined to a building or part of a building. The landlord's suit for ejectment was therefore not barred by the need for prior District Magistrate permission. Mere knowledge by the landlord of unauthorised constructions, without any representation or conduct inducing reliance, did not create estoppel against termination of the lease. The lessee's right to remove constructions under the Transfer of Property Act did not prevent determination of the lease or ejectment. en-us Tue, 28 Mar 1972 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Jul 2020 10:55:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289179 A tenancy of land with constructions did not amount to "accommodation" under the U.P. (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947 because the statutory definition was confined to a building or part of a building. The landlord's suit for ejectment was therefore not barred by the need for prior District Magistrate permission. Mere knowledge by the landlord of unauthorised constructions, without any representation or conduct inducing reliance, did not create estoppel against termination of the lease. The lessee's right to remove constructions under the Transfer of Property Act did not prevent determination of the lease or ejectment. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 28 Mar 1972 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289179