https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289178 Rights in forest produce that form part of proprietary interests vest in the State under the Abolition of Proprietary Rights Act unless saved by the statute, so the forest and standing trees passed to the State on vesting. Trees did not become the buyer's goods before vesting because ownership could pass only after identification and severance in accordance with the contract, and the contract itself contemplated felling before property passed. A proposed compromise on 5 February 1955 also failed to create a binding contract because the reply was qualified, not an unconditional acceptance. The plaintiff's claim accordingly failed. en-us Sat, 11 Oct 1969 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Jul 2020 10:34:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289178 Rights in forest produce that form part of proprietary interests vest in the State under the Abolition of Proprietary Rights Act unless saved by the statute, so the forest and standing trees passed to the State on vesting. Trees did not become the buyer's goods before vesting because ownership could pass only after identification and severance in accordance with the contract, and the contract itself contemplated felling before property passed. A proposed compromise on 5 February 1955 also failed to create a binding contract because the reply was qualified, not an unconditional acceptance. The plaintiff's claim accordingly failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Sat, 11 Oct 1969 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289178