<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 426 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396757</link>
    <description>In a sunset review, continuation of anti-dumping duty depends on whether expiry is likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury, assessed on the factual indicators in the review rules and annexure. The original-investigation standard of re-establishing a fresh causal link and the section 9A(1) ceiling are not automatically imported into that exercise. On the facts, sufficient material supported a finding of likely recurrence, so continuation of duty was upheld. The authority also was not bound to treat the exporter as non-cooperative merely because questionnaire responses were incomplete; reliance on available facts remained permissible, and the request for residual duty was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 May 2021 12:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=617704" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 426 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396757</link>
      <description>In a sunset review, continuation of anti-dumping duty depends on whether expiry is likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury, assessed on the factual indicators in the review rules and annexure. The original-investigation standard of re-establishing a fresh causal link and the section 9A(1) ceiling are not automatically imported into that exercise. On the facts, sufficient material supported a finding of likely recurrence, so continuation of duty was upheld. The authority also was not bound to treat the exporter as non-cooperative merely because questionnaire responses were incomplete; reliance on available facts remained permissible, and the request for residual duty was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396757</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>