https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289174 The appeal under section 26 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 against the Adjudicating Authority's order involved defects due to a joint appeal by three appellants. Separate appeals were allowed, and a reply was sought from the Respondent. A stay application was made regarding the notice to vacate properties, with arguments on property valuation and substitution with fixed deposits. A prima facie case for maintaining the status quo on properties was established, with both parties directed to comply. The Respondent was given time to respond, and the matter was scheduled for a hearing with an order to follow. en-us Wed, 12 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Jul 2020 19:39:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289174 The appeal under section 26 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 against the Adjudicating Authority's order involved defects due to a joint appeal by three appellants. Separate appeals were allowed, and a reply was sought from the Respondent. A stay application was made regarding the notice to vacate properties, with arguments on property valuation and substitution with fixed deposits. A prima facie case for maintaining the status quo on properties was established, with both parties directed to comply. The Respondent was given time to respond, and the matter was scheduled for a hearing with an order to follow. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 12 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289174