https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289170 An appeal filed 26 days beyond the 30-day period under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was held beyond the statutory limit, so condonation of delay did not arise. On that basis, the Appellate Tribunal found it had no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal and declined to examine the merits. The appeal was therefore treated as not maintainable and dismissed for want of jurisdiction. en-us Thu, 26 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Jul 2020 19:38:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289170 An appeal filed 26 days beyond the 30-day period under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was held beyond the statutory limit, so condonation of delay did not arise. On that basis, the Appellate Tribunal found it had no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal and declined to examine the merits. The appeal was therefore treated as not maintainable and dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 26 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289170