<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (9) TMI 48 - PATNA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22762</link>
    <description>Reassessment under the Income-tax Act could not be initiated while the original assessment proceedings were still pending, because income could not yet be treated as having escaped assessment and the statutory precondition for section 148 was therefore absent. The record also showed no recorded reason for issuing the notice. On that basis, the notice under section 148 was invalid and the reassessment was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 17:47:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=61761" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (9) TMI 48 - PATNA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22762</link>
      <description>Reassessment under the Income-tax Act could not be initiated while the original assessment proceedings were still pending, because income could not yet be treated as having escaped assessment and the statutory precondition for section 148 was therefore absent. The record also showed no recorded reason for issuing the notice. On that basis, the notice under section 148 was invalid and the reassessment was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22762</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>