https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289151 A writ petition under Article 226 challenging a SEBI show-cause notice for alleged insider trading was held premature where the petitioners could participate in the proceedings and raise objections there. The Court noted that complaints about incomplete inspection of records, limitation, and natural justice could be urged before SEBI or in any challenge to a final adverse order. As the petition appeared aimed at stalling pending adjudicatory proceedings, no interference with the notice was warranted at that stage, and the writ challenge was declined. en-us Mon, 06 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Jul 2020 10:29:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289151 A writ petition under Article 226 challenging a SEBI show-cause notice for alleged insider trading was held premature where the petitioners could participate in the proceedings and raise objections there. The Court noted that complaints about incomplete inspection of records, limitation, and natural justice could be urged before SEBI or in any challenge to a final adverse order. As the petition appeared aimed at stalling pending adjudicatory proceedings, no interference with the notice was warranted at that stage, and the writ challenge was declined. Case-Laws SEBI Mon, 06 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289151