https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396717 The court ruled that the appellant is not entitled to receive all documents in possession of the Adjudicating Officer (AO) of SEBI, including those not relied upon in the show cause notice. It was held that only documents referenced in the show cause notice need to be disclosed, in line with the principles of natural justice and the SEBI Act and Rules. The appellant's request for broader disclosure was rejected, and the appeal was dismissed. The appellant was given an additional opportunity to respond to the show cause notice by a specified deadline. en-us Wed, 12 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Jul 2020 08:34:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396717 The court ruled that the appellant is not entitled to receive all documents in possession of the Adjudicating Officer (AO) of SEBI, including those not relied upon in the show cause notice. It was held that only documents referenced in the show cause notice need to be disclosed, in line with the principles of natural justice and the SEBI Act and Rules. The appellant's request for broader disclosure was rejected, and the appeal was dismissed. The appellant was given an additional opportunity to respond to the show cause notice by a specified deadline. Case-Laws SEBI Wed, 12 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396717