https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396716 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the transportation contracts for local transportation of Iron Ore, which included loading and unloading activities, could not be taxed under the category of "Cargo Handling Service." The tribunal also rejected the classification of the appellant as a Cargo Handling Agent and found that the demand for service tax was partly barred by the normal period of limitation. Consequently, the tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal. en-us Tue, 24 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Jul 2020 08:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396716 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the transportation contracts for local transportation of Iron Ore, which included loading and unloading activities, could not be taxed under the category of "Cargo Handling Service." The tribunal also rejected the classification of the appellant as a Cargo Handling Agent and found that the demand for service tax was partly barred by the normal period of limitation. Consequently, the tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 24 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396716