https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289138 Section 102 of the Code of Civil Procedure bars a second appeal in a suit of the nature cognizable by a Court of Small Causes when the statutory value limit is not exceeded. Even where Section 9 of the U.P. Civil Laws Amendment Act, 1972 contemplated transfer of such pending suits to the Small Cause Court, the suit retained its character as a small causes suit. As a result, the second appeal was not maintainable. Conversion of the memorandum of appeal into a civil revision was treated as discretionary and was declined because the party had proceeded through trial in the regular court and had already obtained a full hearing on merits in the lower appellate court. en-us Wed, 22 May 1974 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Jul 2020 10:03:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289138 Section 102 of the Code of Civil Procedure bars a second appeal in a suit of the nature cognizable by a Court of Small Causes when the statutory value limit is not exceeded. Even where Section 9 of the U.P. Civil Laws Amendment Act, 1972 contemplated transfer of such pending suits to the Small Cause Court, the suit retained its character as a small causes suit. As a result, the second appeal was not maintainable. Conversion of the memorandum of appeal into a civil revision was treated as discretionary and was declined because the party had proceeded through trial in the regular court and had already obtained a full hearing on merits in the lower appellate court. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 22 May 1974 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289138