<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (5) TMI 129 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289136</link>
    <description>A suit for ejectment and mesne profits must be characterised from the plaint, and where the defendants are pleaded as unauthorised occupants with no subsisting lessor-lessee relationship, it falls outside the cognizance of a Court of Small Causes. Section 15 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887, read with Article 4 of the Second Schedule as substituted in Uttar Pradesh, preserves only the limited exception for a lessor suing a lessee after determination of the lease. The court further stated that want of inherent subject-matter jurisdiction cannot be cured by consent, acquiescence or waiver, and any decree passed in such circumstances is a nullity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2022 11:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=617554" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (5) TMI 129 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289136</link>
      <description>A suit for ejectment and mesne profits must be characterised from the plaint, and where the defendants are pleaded as unauthorised occupants with no subsisting lessor-lessee relationship, it falls outside the cognizance of a Court of Small Causes. Section 15 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887, read with Article 4 of the Second Schedule as substituted in Uttar Pradesh, preserves only the limited exception for a lessor suing a lessee after determination of the lease. The court further stated that want of inherent subject-matter jurisdiction cannot be cured by consent, acquiescence or waiver, and any decree passed in such circumstances is a nullity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289136</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>