https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289126 The court dismissed two petitions challenging the settlement of fisheries under Rule 12 of the Assam Fishery Rules. The petitioners contended that Rule 12 granted excessive discretion to the executive, violating constitutional rights. However, the court upheld the government's authority to make direct settlements based on special circumstances, emphasizing the need for specific objections during the settlement process to challenge jurisdiction. Both petitions were dismissed, with the court highlighting the lack of direct challenges to the government's settlement authority under Rule 12. en-us Mon, 16 Dec 1968 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Jul 2020 16:40:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289126 The court dismissed two petitions challenging the settlement of fisheries under Rule 12 of the Assam Fishery Rules. The petitioners contended that Rule 12 granted excessive discretion to the executive, violating constitutional rights. However, the court upheld the government's authority to make direct settlements based on special circumstances, emphasizing the need for specific objections during the settlement process to challenge jurisdiction. Both petitions were dismissed, with the court highlighting the lack of direct challenges to the government's settlement authority under Rule 12. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 16 Dec 1968 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289126