https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289118 Expenses for Griha Pravesam and Ritusanti were treated as part of the recognised marriage ceremonies for a Brahmin girl, so the person legally bound to bear marriage expenses remained liable and recovery of the proved amount was allowed. A suit for reimbursement was maintainable under Section 69 of the Indian Contract Act because the plaintiff had an interest in paying expenses the defendant was legally bound to meet. The decree was therefore modified to permit recovery only of the legitimate, proved marriage expenses, and the remaining claims were disallowed. en-us Wed, 05 Nov 1902 00:00:00 +0521 Wed, 15 Jul 2020 15:34:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289118 Expenses for Griha Pravesam and Ritusanti were treated as part of the recognised marriage ceremonies for a Brahmin girl, so the person legally bound to bear marriage expenses remained liable and recovery of the proved amount was allowed. A suit for reimbursement was maintainable under Section 69 of the Indian Contract Act because the plaintiff had an interest in paying expenses the defendant was legally bound to meet. The decree was therefore modified to permit recovery only of the legitimate, proved marriage expenses, and the remaining claims were disallowed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 05 Nov 1902 00:00:00 +0521 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289118