https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289115 The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, dismissing the plaintiffs' suit. It held that the Tagai loan was a joint family debt, the property was liable for its repayment, and the revenue sale was valid. The doctrine of pious obligation and the comprehensive scope of the Land Improvement Loans Act supported the binding nature of the debt on the joint family property. The Court concluded, "The sale is valid and the purchaser acquired a full and complete title to the property." The appeals were allowed with no order as to costs throughout. en-us Wed, 27 Sep 1978 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Jul 2020 15:23:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289115 The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, dismissing the plaintiffs' suit. It held that the Tagai loan was a joint family debt, the property was liable for its repayment, and the revenue sale was valid. The doctrine of pious obligation and the comprehensive scope of the Land Improvement Loans Act supported the binding nature of the debt on the joint family property. The Court concluded, "The sale is valid and the purchaser acquired a full and complete title to the property." The appeals were allowed with no order as to costs throughout. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 27 Sep 1978 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289115