<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 334 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396665</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal in an income tax assessment case for AY 2001-02. It upheld additions where the source of income was unproven despite confirmation letters but deleted additions for explained demand drafts. The decision emphasized the importance of providing complete documentation and complying with legal requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2020 15:22:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=617441" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 334 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396665</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal in an income tax assessment case for AY 2001-02. It upheld additions where the source of income was unproven despite confirmation letters but deleted additions for explained demand drafts. The decision emphasized the importance of providing complete documentation and complying with legal requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396665</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>