<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 332 - ITAT RANCHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396663</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by classifying the sale of land as business income, directing the Assessing Officer to compute tax liability accordingly. It remitted the issues of unexplained opening capital balance and cash deposits for further examination. The penalty under section 271(1)(c) was canceled, considering extraordinary circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2024 10:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=617437" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 332 - ITAT RANCHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396663</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by classifying the sale of land as business income, directing the Assessing Officer to compute tax liability accordingly. It remitted the issues of unexplained opening capital balance and cash deposits for further examination. The penalty under section 271(1)(c) was canceled, considering extraordinary circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396663</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>