<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 331 - ITAT RANCHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396662</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the second order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) under section 263 on 28.03.2019, ruling it was not sustainable in law. It was held that the Assessing Officer had adequately examined the issues raised during the original and subsequent assessment proceedings, and the order was not erroneous or prejudicial to revenue. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of finality in legal proceedings and concluded that the PCIT cannot revise the same assessment order twice under section 263.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2020 15:17:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=617435" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 331 - ITAT RANCHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396662</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the second order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) under section 263 on 28.03.2019, ruling it was not sustainable in law. It was held that the Assessing Officer had adequately examined the issues raised during the original and subsequent assessment proceedings, and the order was not erroneous or prejudicial to revenue. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of finality in legal proceedings and concluded that the PCIT cannot revise the same assessment order twice under section 263.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396662</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>