https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289112 The court concluded that the transaction was deemed a sale rather than a valid oral gift (hiba-bil-ewaz) due to the lack of registration. As a result, the plaintiff was only entitled to the one anna share inherited by Shahzadi, not the entire share claimed. The appellate court dismissed the appeal, affirming the lower appellate court's decree and holding that the oral gift was invalid without registration. en-us Tue, 26 Aug 1947 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Jul 2020 14:37:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289112 The court concluded that the transaction was deemed a sale rather than a valid oral gift (hiba-bil-ewaz) due to the lack of registration. As a result, the plaintiff was only entitled to the one anna share inherited by Shahzadi, not the entire share claimed. The appellate court dismissed the appeal, affirming the lower appellate court's decree and holding that the oral gift was invalid without registration. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 26 Aug 1947 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289112