<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1921 (4) TMI 1 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289111</link>
    <description>The Court remanded the case to the lower Appellate Court for further consideration regarding the interpretation of a heba-bil-ewaz document as a simple gift without consideration. Emphasizing the distinction between a heba and a heba-bil-ewaz under Muhammadan Law, the Court highlighted the need for evidence of consideration. The judges discussed the importance of determining the nature of a transaction based on the parties&#039; actual intention, even if the document mentioned consideration. The plaintiff was instructed to provide proof of consideration, and the case was to be reconsidered and disposed of accordingly, with costs to follow the final outcome.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 1921 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2020 14:33:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=617429" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1921 (4) TMI 1 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289111</link>
      <description>The Court remanded the case to the lower Appellate Court for further consideration regarding the interpretation of a heba-bil-ewaz document as a simple gift without consideration. Emphasizing the distinction between a heba and a heba-bil-ewaz under Muhammadan Law, the Court highlighted the need for evidence of consideration. The judges discussed the importance of determining the nature of a transaction based on the parties&#039; actual intention, even if the document mentioned consideration. The plaintiff was instructed to provide proof of consideration, and the case was to be reconsidered and disposed of accordingly, with costs to follow the final outcome.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 1921 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289111</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>