https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289109 The High Court ruled in favor of the plaintiff in a dispute over the ownership of survey No. 347, determining that the gift of the land by the plaintiff's husband as mahr was a valid pure gift exempt from registration requirements. The court clarified the distinction between hiba-bil-iwaz and emphasized the importance of possession in gift transactions. The case was remanded to the trial court for further proceedings to establish the validity of the gift and address the issue of possession. en-us Wed, 27 Feb 1946 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Jul 2020 14:17:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289109 The High Court ruled in favor of the plaintiff in a dispute over the ownership of survey No. 347, determining that the gift of the land by the plaintiff's husband as mahr was a valid pure gift exempt from registration requirements. The court clarified the distinction between hiba-bil-iwaz and emphasized the importance of possession in gift transactions. The case was remanded to the trial court for further proceedings to establish the validity of the gift and address the issue of possession. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 27 Feb 1946 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289109