<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1951 (10) TMI 29 - HYDERABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289108</link>
    <description>The High Court of Hyderabad reversed the lower court decree, granting possession of a house to the plaintiff-respondent based on a marriage agreement conveying the house to her in lieu of dower. The court considered the unregistered marriage certificate admissible as evidence for collateral purposes, despite the defendant-appellant&#039;s denial of the marriage and transfer of the house, claiming ownership and mortgage rights.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2020 14:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=617425" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1951 (10) TMI 29 - HYDERABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289108</link>
      <description>The High Court of Hyderabad reversed the lower court decree, granting possession of a house to the plaintiff-respondent based on a marriage agreement conveying the house to her in lieu of dower. The court considered the unregistered marriage certificate admissible as evidence for collateral purposes, despite the defendant-appellant&#039;s denial of the marriage and transfer of the house, claiming ownership and mortgage rights.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289108</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>