<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1936 (3) TMI 12 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289107</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the oral gift made by Habib Baksh to Mt. Kulsum Bibi was valid under Mohammadan Law. The Court found no fraudulent intent to defraud other creditors, ruled that oral evidence was admissible, and allowed Mt. Kulsum Bibi to retain possession of the property until her dower debt was paid. The appeal was allowed with costs in both courts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 1936 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2020 14:05:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=617424" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1936 (3) TMI 12 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289107</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the oral gift made by Habib Baksh to Mt. Kulsum Bibi was valid under Mohammadan Law. The Court found no fraudulent intent to defraud other creditors, ruled that oral evidence was admissible, and allowed Mt. Kulsum Bibi to retain possession of the property until her dower debt was paid. The appeal was allowed with costs in both courts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 1936 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289107</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>