<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (9) TMI 44 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22743</link>
    <description>The Kerala High Court treated consideration from the sale of urban agricultural land as liable to capital gains tax. It followed its earlier Division Bench view and relied on the retrospective amendment to section 2(14) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 by section 3 of the Finance Act, 1989, which brought such land within the charging provision. On that basis, the taxability of these transactions was held to be clear, and the issue was answered in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 16:06:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=61742" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (9) TMI 44 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22743</link>
      <description>The Kerala High Court treated consideration from the sale of urban agricultural land as liable to capital gains tax. It followed its earlier Division Bench view and relied on the retrospective amendment to section 2(14) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 by section 3 of the Finance Act, 1989, which brought such land within the charging provision. On that basis, the taxability of these transactions was held to be clear, and the issue was answered in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22743</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>